检查文字中可能的 AI 生成特征。
The detector is designed to help writers spot AI-like signals before a draft moves into submission, publishing, or team review. It gives directional feedback, not a final judgment, so results should be paired with your own context and human review.
Students, researchers, editors, marketers, and content teams use the detector when they need a second look at tone, repetition, and phrasing patterns.
Paste your draft, run the scan, then review the report at the passage and sentence level. The best workflow is to revise flagged areas with specific examples, clearer transitions, and your own judgment.
The report can point to generic phrasing, repeated structures, flat transitions, and sections that may need more original detail. Detection results vary by tool, topic, length, and model updates.
No. It estimates AI-like writing signals and should be used as a review aid. A detector score is not proof of authorship.
Use it to find passages worth revising for clearer logic, personal context, concrete examples, and more natural sentence variety.
We recommend a human review before submission. Detection results vary, and your final judgment should guide important writing decisions.
Run a quick review, revise the areas that need more human context, and keep the final decision in your hands.
Count words, characters, sentences, and repeated terms instantly.
Open toolTranslate text and documents, then review the result.
Open toolRefine AI-assisted writing for natural expression.
Open toolReview possible AI-generated patterns in a draft.
Open tool